Questions?????

Standard

So I just finished Reading “A New Culture of Learning : Cultivating the Imagination for a World of Constant Change” by Douglas Thomas and John Seely Brown. It was a very interesting book and there are a few things I would like to tackle. One is the idea of how we currently learn vs. ways in which we could learn differently. So typically in the world we have lived in and to a great extent the world we are still living in, learning in the main system of education is teacher to student. It is a one way relationship and it infers that there is an expert and a novice in the situation. A different way of thinking about learning in this book is through a collective. This concept makes perfect sense to me since to some degree it is how the DL program through Luther Seminary encourages us to learn. We have created cohorts that represent groups striving to learn to receive a degree. An example of how this is a collective is though we only sit in a class room four weeks out of the year, we continually converse in our online classes to learn and grow in the areas we study and also connect through social media. This social media is the area in which I feel we learn a different aspect of what it means to be a pastor and to deal with the issues and aspects that arise in the church. There have been questions on Facebook that span from how to preach on certain issues to doing a reading of a Psalm together for spiritual growth and reflection. This is the fascinating aspect of learning in this way. I have learned things that I never thought to ask because some one else thought to ask them and I am interested in the information.

So for me this comes down to questions. In the example given, we all have a question of how do we become leaders in the Church. It is through this question that we find out new ways to look at things. The trouble and challenge lies in not necessarily asking the question but dealing with where asking that question leads. When you ask a question, if you are truly invested in the answer you will learn a number of new things and as explained in the book there are a number of different ways in today’s culture that allow for you to connect and learn with others regarding that question. But most of the time that question will lead to more questions and as you continue to ask questions in all likelihood it will lead to action in one form or another (asking more questions or reacting to the answers.) And action typically leads to change.

This brings me to the second thing I want to address: living in a culture of change is not easy. I would agree that we need to live into that reality and we need to learn from it in various forms, yet we cannot do this at the loss of who we are and an aspect of having peace in the midst of this chaos. There are a number of questions I thought of as I read this book. Some have to deal with concepts and others are tangents regarding aspects of my own faith journey.

  • Question 1: If we go to a model of learning by tacit and collective knowledge, will I have a need for the static knowledge way in which we have taught? The idea that at times I just want a straight-forward answer and the idea that there is never a straight- forward answer makes life even that more challenging.
  • Question 2: What might this look like for education in the church? Especially confirmation? What if we had the youth determine what they want to learn and discuss in a constructive group? Would this change our outcome of students graduating from confirmation and not stepping in to a church again? Maybe that is not the right question to ask, but would the youth benefit from being able to be drawn into what they are interested in learning regarding religion?
  • Question 3: Could this mentality change the way we preach the gospel and if so how would it change it?
  • Question 4: How do we enact indwelling? Han you enact it is it even possible or does it rely solely on the person?

So many questions left unanswered, yet I am excited to explore what they may mean and to hear thoughts on what others think.

5 responses »

  1. The cohort style of learning you mention is a perfect example of the collective discussed in this book. I’m intrigued by your questions, particularly number 2. Utilizing a collective environment with confirmation students would probably be very engaging. Part of the opening I utilize with my students is to have them share something about which they were curious or puzzled in the past week. It has been very enlightening experiment.

  2. I will be reading A New Culture of Learning this weekend. I’ve read other students’ blogs about this book, and I’m quite intrigued. This new culture of learning is very exciting, and of course, as distributed learning students at Luther Seminary, it’s one in which we are privileged to be engaged. I don’t know if it’s because I’m almost 50 years old (aka “old” by my children’s standards) and I spent all of my previous schooling (K-12, college, and grad school) engaged in the “old” culture of learning, but I appreciate the teacher as “expert.” I believe the teacher can (and should) have expertise in the subject matter in order to facilitate and encourage learning, but I think the “new culture” requires the “experts” to think differently about how they teach. This also means we as ministers need to think differently about how we engage the members of our faith communities. I love your question about confirmation instruction. I’ve taught confirmation for 18 years, and I’ve yet to figure out the best way to do so. One thing I know for sure, though, is the “old” culture of learning has not worked very well for quite some time among the middle school population!

  3. As one of those crazy tactile learners I must admit that I don’t think we will ever be able to completely eliminate static learning or knowledge. Learning mathematics, probably the most stable subject out there, taught me how to think. It taught me reason and logic. Now those tools I bring to other aspects of my learning, but I had to acquire them someplace. While I hate memorization, I see the importance of it. It helps us recall information and bring the voices of others into conversations they are not present for. I really think there needs to be a synthesis of the two.

    • I would like to say that I understand memorization in today’s world but I really don’t, other than exercising our brain and having things memorized when we can’t hear and see anymore. I do think it has become a question of “where can I find the info” not “is it stored in my brain.”

Leave a comment